Feed aggregator

Re: BitPay Service

Bitcoin feeds -

Quote from: MeToday 09:11

Hello BitPay Team,

please have a look into this, it's getting ridiculous if it isn't a long time already.

Thanks,

EFF Statement on Mozilla and the Importance of the Open Internet

EFF's Deeplinks -

We support the Mozilla community and the vital work they've done—and must keep doing—for the open Internet. EFF has been following the discussions around the choice of Brendan Eich as Mozilla’s CEO, including the announcement that he is stepping down.

As partners to Mozilla in campaigns that have included the fight against SOPA/PIPA, the StopWatching.US Coalition against mass surveillance, the effort to Encrypt the Web, the battle to prevent non-consensual online tracking, and ongoing work to make Firefox a more secure browser, we appreciate the frank and honest discussion that the community has undergone over this issue and respect the openness of the process. In that respect, as in many others, the difference between a closed and an open community is profound.

We believe that what Mozilla stands for—building and supporting an open Internet that gives users freedom to communicate, innovate, and stay safe and secure—is a job that few other institutions are in a place to pursue. So as this change occurs, and the discussion continues, we also want to keep our focus on the goal that everyone can agree on: preserving an open Internet.

As David Clark said long ago, the Internet runs best on "rough consensus and running code." That, to us, is the essence of the Mozilla community. This is a team that built the free and open source Firefox browser, and got it into hundreds of millions of people's hands. The open Web is one of humanity's greatest accomplishments, and we look forward to continuing to work with Mozilla to ensure that this vision continues to thrive.


Share this:   ||  Join EFF

Philippines: Inching Toward Censorship

EFF's Deeplinks -

[Accessing] any part of a computer system without right. Cyber-squatting. Cybersex. Computer-related forgery.  What do these things have in common? They are all punishable acts under Philippines’ Cybercrime Prevention Act.

EFF has closely followed the Philippines Republic Act No. 10175, also known as the Cybercrime Prevention Act, since it was passed in September 2012. This controversial Act has been attacked by journalists and rights groups who oppose its draconian legislation, in particular, the libel provision that criminalizes anonymous online criticism. In October 2012, activists in the Philippines took to social media and—taking a cue from the PIPA/SOPA protests—campaigned for website blackouts to encourage action against the law. Then in 2013, a crowdsourced document called the Magna Carta for Internet Freedom was brought to the Senate that, if passed, could have repealed the Act.

These efforts did not go unnoticed; in February of this year, the Supreme Court of the Philippines tempered segments of the Act, declaring certain provisions—including posting a link to libelous material—unconstitutional.

The recent decision by the Philippine Supreme Court deemed the following sections of the Act unconstitutional:

Unsolicited Commercial Communications. — The transmission of commercial electronic communication with the use of computer system which seek to advertise, sell, or offer for sale products and services are prohibited;

Restricting or Blocking Access to Computer Data. — When a computer data is prima facie found to be in violation of the provisions of this Act, the DOJ shall issue an order to restrict or block access to such computer data;

Real-Time Collection of Traffic Data. — Law enforcement authorities, with due cause, shall be authorized to collect or record by technical or electronic means traffic data in real-time associated with specified communications transmitted by means of a computer system.

To summarize, sending spam cannot be considered a crime; the Department of Justice cannot restrict access to or block websites without a court order; and the government cannot monitor phone or internet use in “real-time” without prior court order or warrant.

While this ruling is a step in the right direction, the Supreme Court did ultimately uphold the constitutionality of the Cybercrime Prevention Act as a whole, meaning several articles and provisions that pose a threat to freedom of expression and speech still remain—specifically the law on libel, the one act with which most rights groups are particularly concerned.

The Internet libel provision was upheld by the Philippine Supreme Court, but was distinguished by one important exception from the original law—that only the original author of libelous content can be punished by law, not the recipients who react to, like, or share said libelous content.

Even with this revision, censoring anonymous online criticism is a slippery slope. Many media organizations are working to decriminalize libel in the Philippines. According to the Philippine Center for Investigative Journalism blog, “The Philippines is one of few countries in the world where libel is considered a criminal offense punishable with a prison term. Libel in the Philippines is also unique in that an allegedly libelous statement is presumed to be tainted with malice until the accused proves otherwise.”

Unfortunately, such laws are more common than the Center suggests: Russia, Venezuela, Azerbaijan, Albania, India, and South Korea are just a few of the countries that still consider defamation and libel a criminal offense punishable by imprisonment.

Although the Supreme Court's recent decision on the constitutionality of the Cybercrime Prevention Act provides drastic improvements over the Act's original text, the still highly controversial law continues to worry rights groups about the current state of Internet censorship in the Philippines. Some Filipino politicians seem to be tipping more and more towards Internet censorship—as seen through the recent legislation that requires Internet service providers to install filters to block access child porn. Granted, the Philippines hasn't landed on the Reporters Without Borders' “Enemies of the Internet” list, yet, however it's certainly a country on which we’re keeping watch.

Related Issues: Free SpeechAnonymityInternational
Share this:   ||  Join EFF

Pages

Subscribe to debianHELP aggregator