- Headlines for January 03, 2014
- Texas Student: After Reporting Rape, I Was Accused of "Public Lewdness," Sent to Disciplinary School
- NAFTA at 20: Lori Wallach on U.S. Job Losses, Record Income Inequality, Mass Displacement in Mexico
- Zapatista Uprising 20 Years Later: How Indigenous Mexicans Stood Up Against NAFTA "Death Sentence"
One might cut Paul Krugman a bit of slack for his sorry tale of three money pits, as twice a week he faces the challenge of coming up with an economics column with some manner of hook. Unfortunately, with great prizes (and compensation) comes great responsibility, especially when an academic knowingly exploits fallacies to advance a political agenda.
For its users, money has three classic functions: a medium of exchange, a unit of account, and a store of value. For its government producers, money has three other functions: a source of seignorage, a means of taxation, and a lever of macroeconomic influence. Theses various purposes can sometimes conflict, so tension arises when a monetary innovation appears that better serves some stakeholders than others. As a devout Keynesian, Krugman has the ongoing mission of defending government fiat currencies against all alternatives, whether modern digital or traditional commodity-backed currencies, using any means necessary, not limited to the intellectually honest.
Krugman’s Three Money Pits are 1) the open-pit gold mine in Porgera, Papua New Guinea, 2) the bitcoin mine in Reykjanesbaer, Iceland, and 3) a hypothetical money pit from Keynes’ head. Porgera’s mine is a litany of human-rights horrors, and Krugman implies that gold consumers are somehow to blame. Porgera is really just one example of the resource curse, which applies to numerous countries rich in natural resources but short on democratic institutions. If Krugman drives a car, is he similarly troubled by the provenance of his fuel, the rubber in his tires, or the elements (platinum, palladium, and rhodium) in his catalytic converter? If Krugman laments “burning up resources”, what consumption does he consider to be non-frivolous? Flying to Europe, as he is wont to do, consumes a great deal of resources, not to mention producing a great deal of pollution. If Krugman dislikes commodity-backed currencies and trading with developing nations, one might expect him to enthusiastically support the bitcoin server farms in Iceland: here is a Scandinavian country using renewable resources to produce money out of thin air! Even better, if bitcoin has an intrinsic value, it is as a medium of transferring value globally with almost no transaction costs, an incredible boon to the citizens of developing countries who work in developed nations and currently pay 10% commissions to send home remittances. But no—Krugman reveals his value preferences: a currency not under the control of government and banks is a threat, regardless of its other benefits. A non-arbitrary supply might be the only thing that gold and bitcoin have in common, but for Krugman that is all that matters. His framing of gold and bitcoin as violating human rights and despoiling the environment is designed to arouse emotion and bypass reason.
Bitcoin mining does have a cost, but clearly the total cost is less than that of banks, because in the end bitcoin transactions can be made for commissions that are orders of magnitude lower than the 1–10% that is typically charged by banks, PayPal, the credit cards, and Western Union. Krugman ignores the overhead costs of the current monetary and banking systems, which are clearly non-trivial. The massive computing power devoted to bitcoin is dwarfed by that devoted to recreational uses, from multiplayer games to streaming pornography. Perhaps Krugman has an opinion there also.
When he recruits Adam Smith and John Maynard Keynes into the discussion, Krugman makes more appeals to emotion. He describes Adam Smith as a “patron saint” to conservatives, who resist public spending for creating jobs as “anathema”—clearly conservatives are religious and dogmatic about economics. Meanwhile Krugman paints Keynes as a scientist with theories so accepted that resistance to them must be “political”. Last I heard, scholars in the dismal science had by no means reached a consensus about Keynes’ ideas that a national government can spend money, even burying valuables in a pit, and stimulate more value creation than value consumed.
Adam Smith did indeed call for banking regulation, as Krugman points out gleefully while neglecting to mention the context. In the same paragraph of The Wealth of Nations where Smith mentioned the “dead stock” of silver and gold, he described the precariousness of an economy “suspended upon the Daedalian wings of paper money” rather than traveling upon “the solid ground of gold and silver.” Smith promoted not fiat money, but paper money backed by gold and silver. Smith expounded on the dangers and drawbacks of paper money, but bitcoin is not subject to them. To store value bitcoin leaves no “dead stock”, and its value does not depend on the reliability of human beings. Of course, not everyone would agree with the notion of “dead stock”—to a non-Keynesian, storing value is a respectable function, and if money will not do it properly, people will find other value stores, e.g. larger houses than they need for lodging.
Krugman’s funniest statement was his conclusion, disparaging both gold and bitcoin as “a determined march to the days when money meant stuff you could jingle in your purse” and “digging our way back to the 17th century.” This is certainly a novel way to describe a digital currency that is based on 21st-century NSA-approved cryptographic algorithms and that can be transferred instantly and globally via the Internet without bank intermediaries. I fear that Krugman is the one becoming old-fashioned.
The cloud is poised for rapid growth in the enterprise, with more and more CIOs embracing hybrid models to keep pace with the growing number of devices and applications in the Internet of Things. John McAdam, the president and CEO of F5 Networks, expects this trend to swing into high gear in 2014 across both North America and Europe, where companies are finally warming up to the cloud thanks to the efforts of providers such as Temenos T24.
As more enterprise apps get moved off-premise, the software-as-a-service category of solutions will split up into clearly definable sub-segments like security, disaster recovery and management automation. Along the way, traditional IT organizations will transform into service brokers tasked with providing a consistent set of capabilities to geographically distributed users while maintaining security and compliance across all locations.
NetApp SVP and CTO Jay Kidd has a similar view: he predicts that in-house infrastructure will be increasingly weighed against the advantage of the public cloud as companies pursue higher returns on their technology investments. OpenStack will prove instrumental in helping CIOs justify their on-premise deployments.
“At the moment, AWS is dominating in the public cloud space, but in 2014 we expect to start seeing a vast number of public cloud deployments around the world based on OpenStack,” says Nick Barcet, the vice president of products at OpenStack specialist eNovance. “Eventually, OpenStack will attract more users than other public offers in multi-cloud environments, and we believe that the first step for this to happen is for public clouds to become more open and available starting in 2014,” he predicts.
On the software-defined data center front, both McAdam and Kidd anticipate accelerated adoption in 2014. The NetApp CTO also sees clustered storage, converged infrastructure and in-memory processing gaining momentum this year as new use cases emerge.
The Widening Wealth Gap: Bringing Income Inequality Into Focus. "But just to understand, the top 20 percent of U.S. families have 88 percent of all the wealth..."Topic(s):
By Richard RJ Eskow December 30, 2013 6:00 am Today the forces of corporate consensus are on the defensive. It\'s considered politically reckless to get too far out front on the subject of benefit cuts. What a difference a year makes. Last year at this…Related Posts:
- Bitcoin Not Bombs Promotes Positive Changes in the Social…
- How a Shadowy Network of Corporate Front Groups Distorts the
- This Year in Cybersecurity
- Holiday PSA: Don\'t let CryptoLocker be your family\'s…
- How a Japanese Dog Became the Face of Dogecoin
Was This the Social Contract\'s Comeback Year? is a story from: BitcoinWarrior.net
The post Was This the Social Contract\'s Comeback Year? appeared first on .