On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 2:02 PM, Camaleón wrote:
> On Wed, 25 May 2011 20:41:05 +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
>> On Mi, 25 mai 11, 16:00:07, Camaleón wrote:
>>> And it's not me who thinks that way, but Mozilla who tagged it so.
>> And why should we care (as long as we still get security support, even
>> if it's only from Debian).
> Anyone who estimates his/her security should care.
> We all know (or should know) that any piece of software that is not being
> actively developed (upstream) is a security risk. Yes, Debian security
> team can catch and patch some flaws but not all. Heck, they're good but
> not super-heroes with extra-powers... or are they?
That is a good point. What do you think that it is more secure to use
chromium from the stable repositories or chrome from google's
repositories? Do you think that the chromium version which is at the
stable repositories is secure enough?