NavigationUser loginSpam?See spam posts on this site? If so, please don't reply to the spam! Instead, just report the URL to the webmaster. |
Study: 41 million in U.S. can't afford basicsStudy: 41 million in U.S. can't afford basics One in five working families has a tough time affording basics like shelter and health care while earning too much to qualify for food stamps or Medicaid, according to a new report. About one in five working American families can't afford basic needs, and many scrape to get by on insufficient income and government aid, policy researchers conclude in a report (.pdf file) released today. Many of these workers earn too much to qualify for "work supports" such as Medicaid and food stamps, while their employer-provided health insurance doesn't cover enough of their basic medical costs, according to the report by the Center for Economic and Policy Research and the Center for Social Policy at the University of Massachusetts. "We no longer live in a world where having a job means you're automatically able to make ends meet," said Heather Boushey, co-author of the report. "Our work-support policies need to be updated to support the millions of families with earners in bad jobs." About 41 million people in working families can't afford such basic necessities as health care and housing, according to the report. The study, which examined conditions in nine states and the District of Columbia, found that government programs close about two-fifths of the "hardships gap" -- a measure of the difference between a family's income, including all aid programs, and the local costs of goods and services. "Families fall into the hardships gap because the low-wage labor market provides meager pay and few employment-based work supports for low- and moderate-wage workers," the report noted. The report's authors recommend steps such as focusing on better wages and mandates for employers to provide employment-based benefits, and simplifying the eligibility criteria and application requirements for work supports. "Public policy has not caught up to the reality that even working families may need public work supports," the authors wrote. "Without public work supports, they and their families go without health insurance, adequate child care, safe housing or other necessities. Many of those in the hardships gap earn too much, or do not meet other eligibility criteria, to qualify for work supports, even though they are low-income." In 2005, about one-fifth of workers were in "bad jobs" -- those that paid less than the median wage in 1979 in inflation-adjusted dollars and did not offer health insurance or a retirement plan, according to the report. Employer-based benefits are good for people with access to them, but most low-wage workers aren't offered or can't afford them, the report said. "While workers with moderate or high earnings commonly receive health insurance, paid time off and retirement plans, low-wage workers most often do not," the report noted. The median monthly hardships gap for families in the states covered by the report was $1,524. After work supports, that gap decreased to $855. Therefore, the typical family with a hardships gap sees a savings of about $8,000 in work supports. "However, we find that many low-income working families are either ineligible for work supports, or do not receive the supports to which they are entitled," the authors wrote. Part of the problem is that the work supports don't reach all who are eligible due to a complex registration process and a lack of resources. Boushey said government financial aid programs could draw a lesson from the earned income tax credit, which has a relatively straightforward system for eligible recipients to receive benefits. This article was reported and written by Ruth Mantell for MarketWatch. |
Sure
I believe it.
Sure
I saw things falling apart and went off to look for a slightly better place - back then folks told me I was crazy and paranoid and stuff (then again, folks still say that).There's a lot I miss about the USA, but the inequity is destroying the nation and it's too depressing to see things just get worse every year. Some of my good buddies have got their college degrees - even masters' degrees, and they're flipping burgers and such. My dad used to say "it won't be long now before the PhDs are sweeping the streets". In the words of Kent Brockman (The Simpsons): "unemployment is no longer just for philosophy majors". So much for the "government of the people, for the people" - only a lunatic would claim that the government is not owned by the aristocracy and in the service of the aristocracy. Goodbye equality, hello to the new slavery. Go shovel out the animal pens and love it, because that's what you were born to do. If you complain, they'll just truck in more Mexicans. If you organize a protest they'll call you a terrorist and shoot you.
Did they look at the effects of consumer debt?
I think the study overlooked some major problems that lead to poverty.. like excess spending and debt, which probably chains down at least 40 million Americans. Still I must agree that there is a disturbing and growing gap between the wealthy and the poor in this country, and something has to happen to correct that.
Did they look at the effects of consumer debt?
I'm one of those people, the problem seems to be that the income for the working person is not increasing, while the cost of living continues to increase!
Trucking in thousands of illegal immigrants and tax cuts for the rich don't help much either!
We do not need illegal immigrants and we do not need tax cuts for the rich!
Did they look at the effects of consumer debt?
The illegal immigrants aren't the enemy - it's the folks who want a higher profit at the expense of their countrymen. If they didn't give jobs to the illegals, there would be less incentive to cross the border. We definitely need more equitable distribution of income though; why does one guy who does a lot of hard work get $6 an hour while some monkey who's off at parties all the time gets over $40M per year (and a lower tax rate)? So what's happening with Bush's plan to rob citizens of more jobs by bringing in Mexican truckies?
By the way, if you ever meet an economist you might want to lock your guns away before talking to them - they'd say Mexican truckies are a good thing because American truckies will lose their jobs and be forced to innovate... and people accuse truckies of being pumped up with drugs.
Mexican Trucks
I was actually OTR trucking when the Mexicans where supposed to come in. Congress stopped it at the last minute. I was in truck stops and I can tell you that not one of us was happy about it. It was funny how it was reported, though. If I remember correctly it was "American truckers excited to compete in Mexico". We were excited alright.