NSA Likely "Reading Windows Software" In Your Computer

Via NY Transfer News Collective * All the News that Doesn't Fit

[ ... if you use Winduhhhs that is. And if you use Winduhhhs, the NSA is perhaps one of the lesser villains crawling around in there. The Russian and Eastern European mafias with their Malware and Phishing networks do a lot more harm, and phone home just as often as anything the piggies install. Nigerian scams, porn-exchange, virus/trojan/etc spam -- if your machine is owned, it could all be going on without your knowledge. Open Source is the answer to that problem. Dump Gatezware!

The piggies? Well, if they're inside the wire at your local telco or cable provider's CO, there's not much you can do except use encryption for everything, and take comfort in the thought that they're already buried in so much shit it will take them 5 months to even get to trying to read today's e-mail. Just assume everything is monitored all the time. And has been since long before J. Edgar Hoover bought his last frock. -NY Transfer]

sent by tsimonds - activ-l - Oct 17, 2007
Posted on The Smirking Chimp (http://www.smirkingchimp.com)

NSA Likely Reading Windows Software In Your Computer

By Sherwood Ross
Created Oct 17 2007 - 10:05am

Sooner or later, a country that spies on its neighbors will turn on its own people, violating their privacy, stealing their liberties.

President Bush's grab for unchecked eavesdropping powers is the culmination of what the National Security Agency(NSA) has spent forty years doing unto others.

And if you're upset by the idea of NSA tapping your phone, be advised NSA likely can also read your Windows software to access your computer.

European investigative reporter Duncan Campbell claimed NSA had arranged with Microsoft to insert special "keys" in Windows software starting with versions from 95-OSR2 onwards.

And the intelligence arm of the French Defense Ministry also asserted NSA helped to install secret programs in Microsoft software. According to France's Strategic Affairs Delegation report, "it would seem that the creation of Microsoft was largely supported, not least financially, by NSA, and that IBM was made to accept the (Microsoft) MS-DOS operating system by the same administration." That report was published in 1999.

The French reported a "strong suspicion of a lack of security fed by insistent rumours about the existence of spy programmes on Microsoft, and by the presence of NSA personnel in Bill Gates' development teams." It noted the Pentagon was Microsoft's biggest global client.

In the U.S., Andrew Fernandez, chief computer scientist with Cryptonym, of Morrisville, N.C., found Microsoft developers had failed to remove debugging symbols used to test his software before they released it.

Inside the code Fernandez found labels for two keys, dubbed "KEY" and NSAKEY". Fernandez, though, termed it NSA's "back door" into the world's most widely used operation system. He said this makes it "orders of magnitude easier for the US government to access your computer." Microsoft called the report "completely false."

Apparently, agenices of the military-industrial complex take on a life of their own. NSA, for example, has long engaged in commercial espionage eavesdropping on European businesses to benefit U.S. firms, according to William Blum, author of "Rogue State"(Common Courage Press).

NSA achieves this through ECHELON("E") -- an intelligence cartel dominated by the U.S. with Great Britain, Australia, New Zealand and Canada as junior partners. Launched in the 1970s to monitor Cold War data, "E" morphed into "a network of massive, highly automated interception stations covering the globe," Blum said.

Using "E", NSA has spied on German and French businesses which, as a result, have come off second best against their American competitors. Among companies targeted were Thomson S.A., of Paris, Airbus Industrie of Blagnac Cedex, France, and the German wind generator-manufacturer Enercon. "We know this technology("E") is there and it is being used on us," Josef Tarkowski, former head of counter-espionage for the German government told The London Sunday Times Internet Edition.

"Like a mammoth vacuum cleaner in the sky," Blum documents, NSA's continuously orbiting satellites "sucks it all up:home phone, office phone, cellular phone, email, fax, telex, satellite transmissions, fiber-optic communications traffic, microwave links, voice, text, images." These are then processed by high-powered computers at Ft. Meade, Md., NSA headquarters.

Billions of messages are sucked up daily, Blum writes, including those by presidents, prime ministers, the UN Secretary-General, the pope, the Queen of England, transnational corporation executives, and foreign embassies. It's been estimated "E" sifts through 99.9999 percent of all global communications to get at the 0.0001 percent that is of interest to it.

Each of the English-speaking partners, Blum asserts, "is breaking its own laws, those of other countries, and international law -- the absence of court-issued warrants permitting surveillance of specific individuals is but one example."

"E" works by mining for key words that are extracted by computers and passed along to humans for evaluation.

Some NSA activities came to light during the countdown to the U.S. invasion of Iraq in 2003. At the time, the U.S. listened in on the private conversations of UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan, UN weapons inspectors in Iraq, and on the deliberations about Iraq of all members of the UN Security Council. It also spied on organizations such as Christian Aid and Amnesty International. Earlier, it was said to have spied on U.S. Senator Strom Thurmond (R.-S.C.).

Less well known has been E's spying on foreign firms. In 1998, German wind generator-maker Enercon developed a cheaper way to generate electricity from wind power, but its U.S. rival, Kenetech, said it had patented a near-identical process, and got a court order to ban Enercon sales in the U.S., reporter Blum writes. NSA's role was exposed when one of its employees revealed he had stolen Enercon's secrets by tapping telephone and computer links between its research and production units.

Again, NSA, with CIA aid, Blum and other sources say, obtained covert information from French Airbus Industrie that enabled its U.S. rivals Boeing and McDonnell Douglas to win a $1 billion contract. "The same agencies also eavesdropped on Japanese representatives during negotiations with the U.S. in 1995 over auto parts trade," Blum added.

The Sunday Times also reported Thomas-CSF, a French electronics maker, lost a $1.4 billion deal to supply Brazil with radar because the U.S. intercepted details of the negotiations and passed them to Raytheon, the U.S. firm that makes the Patriot missile. Raytheon won the contract.

"E" is headquartered on British soil on a 560-acre base at Menwith Hill, in North Yorkshire, the largest listening post in the world, taken over by NSA in 1966. As well, the U.S. operates an enormous radar and communications complex at Bad Aibling, near Munich, that is also an NSA intercept station, and a dozen signals intelligence bases in Japan.

NSA also read other peoples' mail by inking a secret agreement with Crypto AG, a Swiss maker of encryption technology, to rig their machines before sale so that when foreign governments used the random encryption key the enciphered message would be clandestinely transmitted to NSA.

The result: when Iran, Iraq, Libya, Yugoslavia and more than 100 other countries sent messages to their embassies, trade offices, and armed forces around the world via telex, fax, and radio, NSA spooks could read them. NSA, by the way, employs some 30,000 workers and, if it were a private corporation, would rank among the top 50 on the "Fortune 500." It's budget, of course, is secret but it's a bet NSA is cheerfully gobbling up umpteen billions of your tax dollars every year. Of course, other countries today emulate NSA's activities. China, for example, is said to have hacked into British defense and foreign policy secrets and the German weekly Der Spiegel recently reported German computers at the chancellery, and foreign, economic, and research ministries are infected by Chinese espionage programs.

Rather than shutting down or curbing NSA activities, President Bush is expanding NSA's role. Even if a rubber stamp Congress goes along, not everybody approves. The American Bar Association, our largest lawyer group, has denounced Bush's warrantless domestic surveillance program.

"The issue is whether the president can unilaterally conduct secret surveillance, taking into his hands the awesome power to invade privacy," ABA President Michael Greco said.

Greco may be upset because the Bill of Rights declares: "The right of people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probably cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."

But what did George Washington know compared to George Bush?

[About author Sherwood Ross is an American reporter who has worked for major American newspapers and magazines as well as international wire services. To comment on this article or arrange for speaking engagements: ]

0

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

No need to spy ...

Just look at what Microsoft was doing in the EU. After bids for a particular project close, take senior officials to lunch, obtain commercial-in-confidence information, and revise the bid.

Does the USA spy on allies? Absolutely. Many of these 'friendlies' also spy on the USA, but it's a very lopsided relationship.

practically speaking

I understand the urge to snoop to best a business competitor, but the claim that it's for national security just does not seem to be workable to me on a practical level. At most a minuscule amount of information of national security importance could be gleaned from all the intercepted email and phone conversations. Not only that, but I've not ever heard anyone address the question of translation. I mean, it's extremely unlikely that email/telephone traffic discussing plans to blow a crater the size of Nebraska on the Eastern seaboard will be laid out using flawless English. I'd expect folks to, at least, use their cradle tongue if they were even stupid enough to work out plans for such an endeavor over channels they KNOW are being monitored.
So, we have all email/phone traffic logged to disk somewhere, run it through a suite of translation software and come up with something that approximates the actual exchange. Then you pass it through filters to identify suspicious passages or words. Can you imagine an exchange like: "So Ali and I went to the races this week with the boss and the odds were like 10:1 for the horse named "Smash Capital" and then we got an inside tip that the groom said the horse was gonna have a real off day. So the boss says to me that I'd better hustle over to the window and place a bet on another horse to cover what we might loose on the bets we'd already placed." (actually I've never even been to a horse race and the likelihood that I have the mechanics of betting, odds and so on completely wrong is high, but this is just a sort of example.)
Now, what could this be? What it seems to be, or part of some heinous plan. Who knows. Neither could the software, but it might flag it as suspicious and that would trigger some sort of follow through of better translation, checks of the correspondents and etc. And there we encounter even more problems.
Suppose the communication actually does make it out to be assigned for field follow-through. They have about three possible outcomes- a real hit, a clear miss, or undetermined. So how does the feedback from follow-through back to the folks writing the software filters for flagging stuff actually work. I can't even begin to imagine that this will work worth a shit.
What if the software does not flag something and it turns out to be crucial. How do they plan to adjust the filters. I know, I know. Just keep pouring billions of dollars into the accounts of political donors and they'll keep working on those filters. Hush, hush though. Can't say what we are or are not doing, succeeding of failing, breaking the law or not. Those terrorists might be listening in.

practically speaking

I don't think all voice can be monitored either - but email can be. Google does it all the time. The reason the goons are acting in an unconstitutional fashion with unwarranted phone taps etc. is that they haven't got good info, and they're too stupid to know where to start to look. Just look at the farce at airports - pull over some whiteys to claim that the searches are "random". Yeah - personally I don't know anyone stupid enough to fall for that line. Then again the muslims in Serbia are white ... so you kind of wish the checks really were random, but you know they're not. Oh no - granny's got a knitting needle! Put that needle down NOW ma'am or we'll have to shoot you! Don't you just love the TSA... Then again, I guess they're preventing terrorists from knitting a gun while on the flight...

Life amongst the unwashed.

If Allah had wanted man to fly, he would have given him wings!

NSA Likely "Reading Windows

But hey, i would bet that people from Serbia are going to have unusual luck for getting into those random checks. :-).

NSA Likely "Reading Windows

Only the "random" checks designated by the "SSSS" printed on the ticket. There are other "random" checks made without seeing the tickets and the Serbs are too white to be noticed - unless they're wearing a bhurka or the muslim skull cap.

It's getting to be like something from a really bad attempt at comedy. At the O'Hare airport I was actually paged a number of times and I had to go find these security guys and let them go through my stuff. I told one I must be the safest guy in the airport because I get searched every few minutes, but he didn't think it was funny.

There are those who would kill us all.

I don't think the government is doing nearly enough to protect us.
I just wanted to state that before the next tragedy.
When the terrorists strike again, everyone will be saying that, including the True Followers of Allah.

No one is safe from the ones who would kill the non-believers.

mindless activity

Mindless activity does not ensure safety. I happened to notice this article this AM.
Check it out.

Terror watch list swells to more than 755,000 names
http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2007-10-23-Watchlist_N.htm

mindless activity

Well spotted. So 0.01% of the GLOBAL population are terrorists! Aaaaahahahahahahahaha! If we detain them all with no charge that'll boost our building industry - we'd have to double the number of prisons. Of course I'd expect Dubbyah to truck in Mexicans for the job so that American builders can "excitedly look forward to competition". I like the excuse that the list might be big because a few names are listed with different spellings - how many thousand ways can you spell "Osama Bin Laden"?

Ooooh, my aching sides. The list isn't "in danger" of becoming a joke, it's a very obvious (and very bad) joke.

(By the way, one way to spell "Osama Bin Laden" is "Lesbian On Adam".)

What is in a name?

Senator Joseph McCarthy had a list. The Soviet Union collapsed.
Is it not possible that lists protect those who incorporate those lists into their daily lives?

It appears the blacklist of today is objected to by the very people that objected fifty years ago. The better Red than Dead crowd now wear a rag on their heads.

How many of the people on this list can actually afford a ticket without the help of a terrorist organization? Does the list reflect this fact?

“McCarthyism is Americanism with its sleeves rolled.”
Joseph R. McCarthy

Wow!

Now, this here is some twisted shit.

The meds haven't kicked in, yet.

m005e,
Follow the bouncing ball down the Road of Life.

"To know a person's religion we need not listen to his profession of faith but must find his brand of intolerance."
Eric Hoffer

"Those in possession of absolute power can not only prophesy and make their prophecies come true, but they can also lie and make their lies come true."
Eric Hoffer

Re: NSA Likely "Reading Windows Software" In Your Computer

Knowing that someone is watching everything I do on my computer is sincerely disturbing. I guess this is not the first time I hear of this but it is the first time I'm concerned about it. We have renounced many of our liberties and now we can't even have a private life.
---
Mary-Anne Davis, Arizona Web Design affiliate.

Syndicate content