Illegal downloaders face Internet ban

LONDON (AFP) - Internet users in Britain who illegally download films and music face being banned from going online, according to leaked government proposals published in The Times on Tuesday.
(Advertisement)

According to the plans, the government "will move to legislate to require internet service providers to take action on illegal file sharing" which record companies and film companies say is costing them billions of dollars (euros) in lost revenue.

The proposals were included in a Green Paper -- the first step to changing a law in Britain -- on the creative industries that is due to be published next week.

The Times said that the plans would involve a "three-strikes" regime -- users would first receive an e-mailed warning if they were suspected of illegally downloading films or music.

They would then receive a suspension from their Internet service upon their second offence, and face a termination of their Internet contract if they were caught on a third occasion.

...............
...............

What, are they going to scan each torrent? Or, will they forbid torrent service entirely?

No votes yet

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Re: Illegal downloaders face Internet ban

Politicians have shit for brains and love totalitarianism (while claiming the democracy is the only way to go). If this rumor is true, then it is the music industry that runs the country. People will be convicted in absentia and without trial and simply banned from using the internet. Hmm... how would the ban be enforced? Told ya politicians have got brown matter rather than grey matter in their heads.

In other astoundingly stupid news - some Australian politicians have announced that they will require ISPs to filter ALL content and block access to pr0n. Uh-huh ... they just need serious supercomputing to run some filters and crack encryption, plus hire one monkey per customer they have so that someone can spy and make sure nothing is getting through. Now Australians in general aren't known for intellectual capacity so their politicians are a special kind of stupid.

Re: Illegal downloaders face Internet ban

I had an experience with JANET (uk university and halls of residence internet service). They claimed I was doing "loopback traffic" (even now i don't know what was that) so they disabled the connection in my residence. With the support that works two hours per week, it took one month to get back online, and this happened when I was lucky enough to find a guy who realised over the phone that I didn't have a clue about "that baaad loopback thingie" and he reinstantiated the connection in a matter of minutes. I had to spend the most intensive month of work on the MSc thesis in late-night cyber cafees and "we work 'till 1am" arabic internet centres since that work could be done only on some remote apps via ssh.

So, I can imagine the potential chaos which can arise.

Re: Illegal downloaders face Internet ban

Why doesn't the music industry avoid all this hassle by encrypting their product? Surely, there is an encryption product that a smart fourteen year old can't hack.
The record companies claim that downloading has caused a large revenue drain yet Elvis still sells.
Maybe they should change to a better encryption and a better caliber of artists.

Contrary to what one might read in the Bell Curve:

Australian genius and Nobel laureates celebrated
"Australians have won more Nobel Prizes in science and medicine, in proportion to population, than any other nation."
http://www.uts.edu.au/new/releases/2004/May/11.html

http://www.mensa.org.au/
The High IQ Society

Re: Illegal downloaders face Internet ban

I like that quote:

"Australians have won more Nobel Prizes in science and medicine, in proportion to population, than any other nation."

Hahahahaha. The claim is demonstrably false, but I guess certain people who shall remain anonymous would swallow that hook.

Re: Illegal downloaders face Internet ban

From slashdot: http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/02/14/1811207&from=rss

UK ISPs Want Copyright Holders to Pay if Users Sue
Posted by Zonk on Thursday February 14, @01:52PM
from the that-road-goes-both-ways dept.
I Don't Believe in Imaginary Property writes
"After the recent draft legislation in the UK, which would create a 'three strikes' policy to cut off anyone accused of online piracy, the ISPs are asking for liability protection when users are wrongly identified. They're worried that when users are wrongly blamed for piracy, as has happened in several widely-reported investigations already, they will turn around and sue their ISP. The ISPs, of course, think that the record companies — or whoever else wrongly identified the file sharers — should be the ones to pay out any such judgments. The British Phonographic Industry, however, disagrees and wants the ISPs to simply use their Terms of Service to disconnect people. Apparently, that means they think that the ToS should be able to remove any legal recourse people might otherwise have against being misidentified."

Re: Illegal downloaders face Internet ban

I'm wondering when the record industry will start sending goons to everyone's house demanding protection money. This is so typical of the industry - "we want to dictate your laws, accuse and convict everyone at whim and without due proceeding, and not be liable for anything." I guess they envy Bill and his Microsoft Tax. Why can't everyone who earns a paycheck pay the music industry a similar tax ...

Re: Illegal downloaders face Internet ban

Sometime in the future - a providers TOS:

....and if we find the user to be the carrier of a genetic disease called illegal downloading we shall sterilise the user by removal of relevant body-parts...

Syndicate content