NavigationUser loginWho's onlineThere are currently 0 users and 29 guests online.
Highest Users
Linux NewsClick the above for your daily dose of Linux news. Food for ThoughtWe're becoming an oligarchic society, with an extreme concentration of wealth. This concentration of wealth is protected through a political process that's making it difficult for anyone but the monied class to have a voice. Spam?See spam posts on this site? If so, please don't reply to the spam! Instead, just report the URL to the webmaster. |
Jerusalem Religious Leaders' Statement on Christian ZionismJerusalem Religious Leaders' Statement on Christian Zionism By Latin Patriarch Michel Sabbah September 1, 2006 "We Stand for Justice. We Can Do No Other" JERUSALEM, AUG. 30, 2006 (Zenit.org).- Here is "The Jerusalem Declaration on Christian Zionism" released Aug. 22. The statement was written by Latin Patriarch Michel Sabbah of Jerusalem and other local heads of Churches in Jerusalem. * * * "Blessed are the peacemakers for they shall be called the children of God." (Matthew 5:9) Christian Zionism is a modern theological and political movement that embraces the most extreme ideological positions of Zionism, thereby becoming detrimental to a just peace within Palestine and Israel. The Christian Zionist program provides a worldview where the Gospel is identified with the ideology of empire, colonialism and militarism. In its extreme form, it laces an emphasis on apocalyptic events leading to the end of history rather than living Christ's love and justice today. We categorically reject Christian Zionist doctrines as false teaching that corrupts the biblical message of love, justice and reconciliation. We further reject the contemporary alliance of Christian Zionist leaders and organizations with elements in the governments of Israel and the United States that are presently imposing their unilateral preemptive borders and domination over Palestine. This inevitably leads to unending cycles of violence that undermine the security of all peoples of the Middle East and the rest of the world. We reject the teachings of Christian Zionism that facilitate and support these policies as they advance racial exclusivity and perpetual war rather than the gospel of universal love, redemption and reconciliation taught by Jesus Christ. Rather than condemn the world to the doom of Armageddon we call upon everyone to liberate themselves from the ideologies of militarism and occupation. Instead, let them pursue the healing of the nations! We call upon Christians in Churches on every continent to pray for the Palestinian and Israeli people, both of whom are suffering as victims of occupation and militarism. These discriminative actions are turning Palestine into impoverished ghettos surrounded by exclusive Israeli settlements. The establishment of the illegal settlements and the construction of the Separation Wall on confiscated Palestinian land undermine the viability of a Palestinian state as well as peace and security in the entire region. We call upon all Churches that remain silent, to break their silence and speak for reconciliation with justice in the Holy Land. Therefore, we commit ourselves to the following principles as an alternative way: We affirm that all people are created in the image of God. In turn they are called to honor the dignity of every human being and to respect their inalienable rights. We affirm that Israelis and Palestinians are capable of living together within peace, justice and security. We affirm that Palestinians are one people, both Muslim and Christian. We reject all attempts to subvert and fragment their unity. We call upon all people to reject the narrow world view of Christian Zionism and other ideologies that privilege one people at the expense of others. We are committed to non-violent resistance as the most effective means to end the illegal occupation in order to attain a just and lasting peace. With urgency we warn that Christian Zionism and its alliances are justifying colonization, apartheid and empire-building. God demands that justice be done. No enduring peace, security or reconciliation is possible without the foundation of justice. The demands of justice will not disappear. The struggle for justice must be pursued diligently and persistently but without violence. "What does the Lord require of you: To act justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with your God." (Micah 6:8) This is where we take our stand. We stand for justice. We can do no other. Justice alone guarantees a peace that will lead to reconciliation with a life of security and prosperity for all the peoples of our land. By standing on the side of justice, we open ourselves to the work of peace -- and working for peace makes us children of God. "God was reconciling the world to Himself in Christ, not counting men's sins against them. And He has committed to us the message of reconciliation." (2 Corinthians 5:19) Patriarch Michel Sabbah Latin Patriarchate, Jerusalem |
Finding no statement decrying the killing of Jews
After reading the article twice and finding no statement decrying the killing of Jews, I decided to investigate further.
After researching each signatory I found them to be Palestinian except Archbishop Swerios Malki Mourad. I couldn't find his place of birth. This drew me to the conclusion that the article should be: Palestinian Religious Leaders' Statement on Christian Zionism.
It also made me wonder why such a slanted article would be posted without info on it's creators.
Propaganda must be much more sophisticated now that we have wikipedia.:)) At the very least, the names should have been changed to Jones or Smith to avoid my "Islamaphobe" curiosity.
"We affirm that Palestinians are one people, both Muslim and Christian. We reject all attempts to subvert and fragment their unity."
As Palestinian Christian, they are betting their lives on the idea that muslims won't retaliate against them.
Great discovery by Jaclon!!
Bravo! You have now discovered that the inhabitants of Palestine are Palestinians. LOL! (did you think they would be Alsacians, Banthu or Okinawans?)
As for why the statement does not 'decry the killing of Jews' (which all politically acceptable statement should, of course, do) the reason is simple: the statement is in rejection of the ideology of *Christian Zionism* which, in the view of the clerics who signed the declaration, does not advocate the killing of Jews, but does advocate the killing of the opponents of this ideology.
You get it? Still not? Ok - one more try, with an illustration this time:
If you wanted to sign a statement denouncing National-Socialism would you include a condemnation of the killing of Germanic people?!
If you still don't get it - I can't help you any further...
But reading the article twice was a good idea. I commend you for it! I only wish you had done some thinking after the reading ;-))
Cheers,
VS
Motto: chown -R linux:GNU world
Distros: Debian, Kanotix, Frenzy, Damn Small Linux
Does this mean the Pope is Italian? Another failure to report?
"Bravo! You have now discovered that the inhabitants of Palestine are Palestinians. LOL! (did you think they would be Alsacians, Banthu or Okinawans?"
Vees,
You are an inhabitant of America. Does that mean you are American?
Don't you think with your superior intelligence, and ivy league education, you should be in Israel settling this Palestinian conflict instead of wasting your time with a mentally challenged individual on a debian website?
I understand the leaders of Hezbollah do not read debianHelp.It's up to you to take the solution to them.I encourage you get out there and do something with your life. Wouldn't it be great to be known as the man who brought peace to the Middle East.
In all sincerity, I believe you are capable of great things.
"We will have peace with the Arabs when they love their children more than they hate us"
Golda Meir
Alas - no Hezbollah for the native 'Americans'
"America" - which you should call the 'USA' - is not a 'normal' country: it is a continent in which Europeans organized a mega-genocide of ALL the natives to conquer and occupy it. Sadly, the natives had no Hezbollah at the time to kick the asses of these colonialists (although the real natives were described by the European propagandists in very similar terms as Hezbollah is described by the very same propagandists today). So no, I am not American, and neither are you (unless of course you can lay claim to be a *real* American - a native American - a not a descendent of a genocidal group of occupiers).
Now, the Middle-East is, thanks God, not an totally occupied territory (yet!) and the natives have not all been massacred by the 'carriers of civilization, democracy and progress". In fact, I would bet that Hezbollah crushing victory and political power marks the end of the Zionist imperial dream.
So, for the time being, being a senior cleric IN the Middle-East and being a senoir cleric FROM the Middle-East still mean the same thing.
Of course, if the ('Christian'-) Zionists have their way, the only clerics left over there will be from outside the Middle-East, but I would not hold my breath for this to happen anytime soon :-P
you are missing the point here - they already have the solution :-)))
Besides,
I am not the one giving (silly) advice to Hezbollah here!
you have a point here...
Motto: chown -R linux:GNU world
Distros: Debian, Kanotix, Frenzy, Damn Small Linux
I'm sorry, I missed the report. Hezbollah clears Lebanon.
"Now, the Middle-East is, thanks God, not an totally occupied territory (yet!) and the natives have not all been massacred by the 'carriers of civilization, democracy and progress". In fact, I would bet that Hezbollah crushing victory and political power marks the end of the Zionist imperial dream."
Vees,
I'm sorry, I missed the report. Could you post the url that describes the battle where Israel was severely defeated and driven out of Lebanon?
I've seen reports of how they are still there and Nasrallah wished he hadn't messed with them but nothing about Hezbollah forcing them out. There was also something about an Israeli air and sea blockade. Has Hezbollah stopped that?
Why do you support a group of terrorists? You are not a sleeper, are you?
christian zionists
Hmm... nice name. Is this the religious lobby running the USA? They get their religion from televangelists who claim to be christian but believe that they must always be on the side of the Jews, destroy the arabs, deliver the land of milk and honey to the jews, and the jews will miraculously convert to their brand of christianity and fullfil all the biblical prophecies? See, we don't need a jewish lobby - we already have a loony lobby running the country. People like Ron Perleman are the least of your worries (and he's one fanatic zionist). Historically the zionists have been trouble - so much so that the Romans got fed up back around 70AD and banned all jews (not just zionists) from the empire.
As for Hezbollah - this is a problem when a terrorist organization is seen as the hero. But the actions of Israel certainly don't endear them to the Lebanese and Palestinians. What Lebanese with at least half a brain would blame Hezbollah for the murder of their neighbors and relatives? It was Israel that was bombing them, not the smaller terrorist group. 2 soldiers kidnapped (not even killed) and they murder thousands of Lebanese. And our monkey president approves of this because "Israel is fighting terrorism" - come on, let's all chant the new mantra! Stalin would be pleased to know that his tactics work well in a "democratic" society. Gee, Joe McCarthy did all sorts of nasty things to people just by calling them "communist", but this "terrorist" thing is so much better - it allows you to indulge in genocide but without all the nasty press that Hitler and Milosevic got.
Does anyone have list of names?
pinniped,
"2 soldiers kidnapped (not even killed)"
That's wonderful to hear. Were they well fed when you talked to them?
"but this "terrorist" thing is so much better"
Hundreds of your fellow citizens at the hands of Hezbollah and you don't think it should be called terroristic? What would you call their murdering Marines and civilians?
In his latest spewing, Ayman al-Zawahiri, along with the American traitor Adam Gadahn, insists you should learn the Koran and convert. What so you think these terrorists will do if you don't? As I've said for sometime, they will cut off your head. Maybe, we should kill them before they kill us?
Does anyone have list?
what a total and complete lack of intellectual honesty
Coming from the same person who did not know that Israel had been booted out from Lebanon by Hezbollah the first time (remember you asked me about that in a private email) I should not be suprized by your question now I suppose. Except that you are trying to mask Israel's strategic defeat by asking the question about who won not the war (which is what matters) but the individual battles. I already answered that here http://www.debianhelp.org/node/1276 and, specifically I wrote:
It is enough to remember the routing of the IDF forces around the village of Bint Jbeil or the fact that after THIRTY DAYS of bombing and fighting the IDF was unable to control the village of Maroun al-Ras from which, according to the IDF, the Hezbollah fighters which captured the two Israeli soldiers came. Maroun al-Ras is located ONE KILOMETER from the Israeli border. As in the case of Bint Jbeil, some IDF units did enter into Maroun al-Ras and the Israelis immediately declared that the village had been taken, only to find out that Hezbollah let them in and then attacked them (the same tactic was used by Chechen guerillas against the Russian forces in Grozny). As was confirmed by British reporters, the IDF never succeeded in taking control of either Maroun al-Ras ir Bint Jbeil. This is clearly a tactical defeat.
You should read the Israeli press more often. You would have no doubt as to who lost and who won and who is trying hard to sneak away from various commissions of inquiery and who is basking in a national consensus of support.
Nasrallah said that if he had know of the magnitude of Israel's retaliatory attack he would not have seized the IDF soldiers. Why? Because the IDF killed over 1300 people a full THIRD of which were children. He - UNLIKE THE OLMERT ADMINISTRATION - does not think that an operation aimed at securing the release of hostages is worth the blood of 400+ kids. And he is honest enough to say that openly.
But does that mean that the IDF defeated Hezbollah? Nope - it only means that the IDF can kill 1300 people.
Nope. Since the sinking the Israeli Navy's flagship Sa'ar 5 ship, the Navy is now safely out of reach of Hezbollah and so are the Israeli planes high up in the sky. But will this blockade achieve ANYTYHING? Nobody with just 1% of understanding of military matters belives so (a country cannot be really blockaded by air and sea only. While such a bockade will stop the economy, it will not prevent weapons from coming through). The sole purpose of that is to make the Lebanese people pay for they support for Hezbollah by taking an ENTIRE NATION hostage. So if you call that a 'victory' you are both an idiot and a person without a conscience.
You have already asked this, and I already answered that here: http://www.debianhelp.org/node/1142. Specifically I wrote:
Being neither Arab nor Jewish, nor Muslim or American and having no connection with the Middle-East other than my personal interest for the region and personaly sympathy for its people, I do not have to 'side' with anyone in this conflict (other than 'siding' with the principles of logic and decency).
Logic tells me that Israel was totally, utterly defeated (just remember the grandiose goals Olmert set for his war). And, more importantly, *deceny* tells me that Israel is a Uber-terrorist racist state which deserves to be denounced along the Zionist ideology it is based upon. This is the only reason why I post here.
As for me being a "sleeper", this is both a totally dishonest thing to ask me since you well know that not only I have no connection to Hezbollah, but you even know from our private emails that I studied and worked along with some of USA's most elite soliders (including senoir officers of Detachment Delta). It is also a reflection of a sick MacCarthian mindset to 'expose' or suspect people of being 'agents' of some nefarious enemy rather than accept that they express their ideas according to the First Amendement of the Constitution. Lastly, such insinuationa are outright dangerous at a time of the fascist big-brother kind of regime which runs the country in Washington and which has thousands of bored employees looking for some 'enemy' to find somewhere, including the Internet.
Jaclon - your total intellectual dishonesty confirms to me that I want nothing more to do with you either here on debianhelp or in my mailbox. It is probably futile to ask you to ignore my future posts on debianhelp and not to send me any more private emails. However, I assure you than none of them will ever be answered again.
I hope that you will one day you trade the blue pill for the red one. Good luck,
VS
PS: Ayman al-Zawahiri is a SUNNI (of the Salafi/Wahabi kind). He *hates* Hezbollah which is SHIA. Like your President you persist in trying hard not to understand anything about the Middle-East and, like him, you make yourself a fool in the eyes of all those who try to learn about something *before* making grandiose statement.
Re:what a total and complete lack of intellectual honesty
"Logic tells me that Israel was totally, utterly defeated (just remember the grandiose goals Olmert set for his war). And, more importantly, *deceny* tells me that Israel is a Uber-terrorist racist state which deserves to be denounced along the Zionist ideology it is based upon. This is the only reason why I post here."
You would risk everything to criticise Israel?
"As for me being a "sleeper", this is both a totally dishonest thing to ask me since you well know that not only I have no connection to Hezbollah, but you even know from our private emails that I studied and worked along with some of USA's most elite soliders (including senoir officers of Detachment Delta). "
I love the way you reversed that. It's a sign of your brilliant mind. You have intimated that I am involved with Hezbollah and that you aren't. Brilliant!
We have all kinds of military serving with ours. Some of the best murders and torturers, amongst the arabs, have served with our troops. We train central american killers at special school. Such wonderful cross pollination of ideas.
"Lastly, such insinuationa are outright dangerous at a time of the fascist big-brother kind of regime which runs the country in Washington and which has thousands of bored employees looking for some 'enemy' to find somewhere, including the Internet."
The Secret Service and the F.B.I. can read. They don't need my interpretation of your postings. What if one of them had a brother in the Beruit Marine Barracks? What would they think of your bragging on our enemy?
FindLaw has an excellent explanation on Free Speech that I enjoyed.
"It is probably futile to ask you to ignore my future posts on debianhelp and not to send me any more private emails. However, I assure you than none of them will ever be answered again."
With respect for you, I blocked your email last week. I'm sure you can block mine. You might check with your email provider.
Why would I ignore your posts? You're not trying to hide something are you?
No matter what you say, you're actions say you are a Genius.
That is why I know you are not a member of any illegal organization. They wouldn't have you.
McCarthy was right
"a sick MacCarthian mindset to 'expose' or suspect people"
History has recently revealed (R.E. the Venona Project) that McCarthy was actually completely right about the vast majority of the people that he suspected. Most of them were commie-loving liberals actually working with the Soviet government!
You are right but don't tell
You are right but don't tell any intellectuals. They have a problem getting beyond Communist propaganda.
Old Joe did a lot of damage along with catching the Commies. That's what gives the intellectuals a leg to stand on.
Yeah... it certainly
Yeah... it certainly would've been a different story if McCarthy could have gone public with all the evidence, rather than keep it a secret to protect the program. As a result, it was viewed mainly as a witchhunt, rather than a legitimate security concern.
Come on people
This is completely futile. Some comments here are really out of the line - holds for both 'sides'.
By the way Ortodox churches are, in contrast to the Catholic Church, independent of each other, many of them nationally and regionaly oriented already from the time of the Byzantine Empire. So, if the proclamation is from Palestine - it is, naturally, the Palestinian Episcopality - consisisting of Palestinian priests.
BDW, even as an opponent of present day Zionism I would never say or comment anything in the directon of being 'fed up' with Jews as a nation. What an ugly thing to mention. I know I pulled it from a context, but even contextually this sounds wrong.