Militantly FREE software support.
Militantly FREE software support.
NavigationUser loginSpam?See spam posts on this site? If so, please don't reply to the spam! Instead, just report the URL to the webmaster. Cost of War |
dri with radeon x200Hi,I'm using debian testing on my laptop that has x200 graphics chipset. With the ati proprietary drivers, 3D acceleration is working but those drivers don't support AIGLX, so I would like to use free radeon drivers. The problem is that I cannot get dri working with the free drivers. The only error message in Bookmark/Search this post with: 
|
• Debian Weekly News - Essential reading for any Debian fan. • Documentation - Debian's own authoritative documentation, including installation docs. • FAQ - Got questions about Debian GNU/Linux? • From Windows to Debian - Tips for converting from Windows to Debian GNU/Linux • Package of the Day. • Security - Security information and alerts! • Bug System - Bug tracking and instructions on reporting bugs. • CD Images - Where/how to get Debian GNU/Linux CD images. • Mailing List Subscription - Dozens of Debian-specific support mailing lists! • Mailing List Archives - Searchable archives of Debian's mailing lists. • Free Software Guidelines - Learn Debian's idea of what "free" software really is. • Package Listings - A very valuable tool: searchable, integrated with bug reports. • Apt-Get Sources - Sources for *.debs which are not official Debian packages. • Backports - Unofficial new software packages that have been "back-ported" to work with the Debian stable/official release. • Developer's Corner - Info about the people behind Debian, policies, and how to package *.deb files.
dri with radeon x200
Hello Andras.
Andras Lorincz, 13.01.2007 13:45:
> I'm using debian testing on my laptop that has x200 graphics chipset. With
> the ati proprietary drivers, 3D acceleration is working but those drivers
> don't support AIGLX, so I would like to use free radeon drivers. The
> problem
> is that I cannot get dri working with the free drivers. The only error
> message in xorg.0.log is "(EE) AIGLX: Screen 0 is not DRI capable" and it
> says that dri module is loaded but glxinfo reports that dri is not working.
> What could be the problem here?
I guess that the radeon driver just doesn’t support DRI on your chipset yet.
This only works up to R350/R400, IIRC.
Regards, Mathias
--
debian/rules
dri with radeon x200
On 1/13/07, Mathias Brodala <info@noctus.net> wrote:
Hello Andras.Andras Lorincz, 13.01.2007 13:45:> I'm using debian testing on my laptop that has x200 graphics chipset. With> the ati proprietary drivers, 3D acceleration is working but those drivers
> don't support AIGLX, so I would like to use free radeon drivers. The> problem> is that I cannot get dri working with the free drivers. The only error> message in xorg.0.log is "(EE) AIGLX: Screen 0 is not DRI capable" and it
> says that dri module is loaded but glxinfo reports that dri is not working.> What could be the problem here?I guess that the radeon driver just doesn't support DRI on your chipset yet.This only works up to R350/R400, IIRC.
Regards, Mathias--debian/rulesIt should be, as it is listed here:http://ftp.x.org/pub/X11R7.0/doc/html/radeon.4.html
dri with radeon x200
Hello Andras.
Andras Lorincz, 13.01.2007 18:45:
> On 1/13/07, Mathias Brodala wrote:
>> Andras Lorincz, 13.01.2007 13:45:
>> > I'm using debian testing on my laptop that has x200 graphics chipset.
>> With
>> > the ati proprietary drivers, 3D acceleration is working but those
>> drivers
>> > don't support AIGLX, so I would like to use free radeon drivers. The
>> > problem
>> > is that I cannot get dri working with the free drivers. The only error
>> > message in xorg.0.log is "(EE) AIGLX: Screen 0 is not DRI capable" and
>> it
>> > says that dri module is loaded but glxinfo reports that dri is not
>> working.
>> > What could be the problem here?
>>
>> I guess that the radeon driver just doesn't support DRI on your chipset
>> yet.
>> This only works up to R350/R400, IIRC.
>
> It should be, as it is listed here:
>
> http://ftp.x.org/pub/X11R7.0/doc/html/radeon.4.html
Hm, not sure what you are trying to say: do you mean that your chipset should
have DRI?
If that is the case, then have you should take a closer look which chipset is
marked as „2D only“.
If that is not the case, just ignore this mail.
Regards, Mathias
--
debian/rules
dri with radeon x200
Hello /me.
Mathias Brodala, 13.01.2007 20:03:
> If that is the case, then have you should take a closer look […]
Yep, me have should take a closer one also.
Mathias
--
debian/rules
dri with radeon x200
On 1/17/07, "Dr. Jörg-Volker Peetz" <joerg-volker.peetz@scai.fraunhofer.de> wrote:
Andras Lorincz wrote:>>>> What is the output of> grep -i enabled /var/log/Xorg.0.log
>>> This gives me:>> (==) AIGLX enabled> (II) RADEON(0): Color tiling enabled by default> (II) RADEON(0): Acceleration enabled> (**) RADEON(0): DPMS enabled> (==) RADEON(0): Silken mouse enabled
> (==) RandR enabled> (II) USB Mouse: ps2EnableDataReporting: succeeded>> and> LIBGL_DEBUG=verbose glxinfo> ?>>> This gives me:>> Xlib: extension "XFree86-DRI" missing on display ":
0.0".> libGL error: XF86DRIQueryDirectRenderingCapable failed> display: :0 screen: 0> direct rendering: No> server glx vendor string: SGI> server glx version string: 1.2> server glx extensions:
> GLX_ARB_multisample, GLX_EXT_visual_info, GLX_EXT_visual_rating,> GLX_EXT_import_context, GLX_EXT_texture_from_pixmap, GLX_OML_swap_method,> GLX_SGI_make_current_read, GLX_SGIS_multisample, GLX_SGIX_hyperpipe,
> GLX_SGIX_swap_barrier, GLX_SGIX_fbconfig, GLX_MESA_copy_sub_buffer> client glx vendor string: ATI> client glx version string: 1.3> client glx extensions:> GLX_EXT_visual_info, GLX_EXT_visual_rating, GLX_EXT_import_context,
> GLX_ARB_get_proc_address, GLX_SGI_video_sync, GLX_ARB_multisample,> GLX_ATI_pixel_format_float, GLX_ATI_render_texture> GLX version: 1.2> GLX extensions:> GLX_EXT_visual_info, GLX_EXT_visual_rating, GLX_EXT_import_context,
> GLX_ARB_multisample> OpenGL vendor string: Mesa project: www.mesa3d.org <http://www.mesa3d.org>> OpenGL renderer string: Mesa GLX Indirect
> OpenGL version string: 1.2 (1.5 Mesa 6.5.1)> OpenGL extensions:> GL_ARB_imaging, GL_ARB_multitexture, GL_ARB_texture_border_clamp,> GL_ARB_texture_cube_map, GL_ARB_texture_env_add,
> GL_ARB_texture_env_combine, GL_ARB_texture_env_dot3,> GL_ARB_transpose_matrix, GL_EXT_abgr, GL_EXT_blend_color,> GL_EXT_blend_minmax, GL_EXT_blend_subtract, GL_EXT_texture_env_add,> GL_EXT_texture_env_combine, GL_EXT_texture_env_dot3,
> GL_EXT_texture_lod_bias> glu version: 1.3> glu extensions:> GLU_EXT_nurbs_tessellator, GLU_EXT_object_space_tess>> visual x bf lv rg d st colorbuffer ax dp st accumbuffer ms cav
> id dep cl sp sz l ci b ro r g b a bf th cl r g b a ns b eat> ----------------------------------------------------------------------> 0x23 24 tc 0 24 0 r y . 8 8 8 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 None
> 0x24 24 tc 0 24 0 r y . 8 8 8 0 0 16 8 16 16 16 0 1 0 None> 0x25 24 tc 0 32 0 r y . 8 8 8 8 0 16 8 16 16 16 16 1 0 None> 0x26 24 tc 0 32 0 r . . 8 8 8 8 0 16 8 16 16 16 16 1 0 None
> 0x27 24 dc 0 24 0 r y . 8 8 8 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 None> 0x28 24 dc 0 24 0 r y . 8 8 8 0 0 16 8 16 16 16 0 1 0 None> 0x29 24 dc 0 32 0 r y . 8 8 8 8 0 16 8 16 16 16 16 1 0 None
> 0x2a 24 dc 0 32 0 r . . 8 8 8 8 0 16 8 16 16 16 16 1 0 None>>> Did you replace the libGL from fglrx?>>> I uninstalled the ati driver before trying the xorg radeon driver if
> you are referring to this.>> Also I compiled the radeon driver and loaded the module from the kernel> before starting X.>Dear Andras Lorincz,next time, please also post your answer in the newsgroup.
In your log /var/log/Xorg.0.log there is no line saying"Direct rendering enabled"So there should be a line saying "Direct rendering disabled" and someexplaining text around it.What is it saying?
Regards,Jörg-Volker.P.S.: I posted this also in the newsgroup linux.debian.userThat's gmail's fault, when I press reply, it doesn't replies by default to the list and I forgot to change the destination :)
As regarding direct rendering, I say hmm...:(II) RADEON(0): Direct rendering broken on XPRESS 200 and 200M(WW) RADEON(0): Direct rendering disabledIt seems that direct rendering is broken in xorg for x200m chipsets. That explains.
dri with radeon x200
On 1/17/07, Andras Lorincz <andras.lorincz@gmail.com> wrote:
On 1/17/07, "Dr. Jörg-Volker Peetz" <
> wrote:
Andras Lorincz wrote:>>>> What is the output of> grep -i enabled /var/log/Xorg.0.log
>>> This gives me:>> (==) AIGLX enabled> (II) RADEON(0): Color tiling enabled by default> (II) RADEON(0): Acceleration enabled> (**) RADEON(0): DPMS enabled> (==) RADEON(0): Silken mouse enabled
> (==) RandR enabled> (II) USB Mouse: ps2EnableDataReporting: succeeded>> and> LIBGL_DEBUG=verbose glxinfo> ?>>> This gives me:>> Xlib: extension "XFree86-DRI" missing on display ":
0.0".> libGL error: XF86DRIQueryDirectRenderingCapable failed> display: :0 screen: 0> direct rendering: No> server glx vendor string: SGI> server glx version string: 1.2> server glx extensions:
> GLX_ARB_multisample, GLX_EXT_visual_info, GLX_EXT_visual_rating,> GLX_EXT_import_context, GLX_EXT_texture_from_pixmap, GLX_OML_swap_method,> GLX_SGI_make_current_read, GLX_SGIS_multisample, GLX_SGIX_hyperpipe,
> GLX_SGIX_swap_barrier, GLX_SGIX_fbconfig, GLX_MESA_copy_sub_buffer> client glx vendor string: ATI> client glx version string: 1.3> client glx extensions:> GLX_EXT_visual_info, GLX_EXT_visual_rating, GLX_EXT_import_context,
> GLX_ARB_get_proc_address, GLX_SGI_video_sync, GLX_ARB_multisample,> GLX_ATI_pixel_format_float, GLX_ATI_render_texture> GLX version: 1.2> GLX extensions:> GLX_EXT_visual_info, GLX_EXT_visual_rating, GLX_EXT_import_context,
> GLX_ARB_multisample> OpenGL vendor string: Mesa project: www.mesa3d.org <
http://www.mesa3d.org>> OpenGL renderer string: Mesa GLX Indirect
> OpenGL version string: 1.2 (1.5 Mesa 6.5.1)> OpenGL extensions:> GL_ARB_imaging, GL_ARB_multitexture, GL_ARB_texture_border_clamp,> GL_ARB_texture_cube_map, GL_ARB_texture_env_add,
> GL_ARB_texture_env_combine, GL_ARB_texture_env_dot3,> GL_ARB_transpose_matrix, GL_EXT_abgr, GL_EXT_blend_color,> GL_EXT_blend_minmax, GL_EXT_blend_subtract, GL_EXT_texture_env_add,> GL_EXT_texture_env_combine, GL_EXT_texture_env_dot3,
> GL_EXT_texture_lod_bias> glu version: 1.3> glu extensions:> GLU_EXT_nurbs_tessellator, GLU_EXT_object_space_tess>> visual x bf lv rg d st colorbuffer ax dp st accumbuffer ms cav
> id dep cl sp sz l ci b ro r g b a bf th cl r g b a ns b eat> ----------------------------------------------------------------------> 0x23 24 tc 0 24 0 r y . 8 8 8 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 None
> 0x24 24 tc 0 24 0 r y . 8 8 8 0 0 16 8 16 16 16 0 1 0 None> 0x25 24 tc 0 32 0 r y . 8 8 8 8 0 16 8 16 16 16 16 1 0 None> 0x26 24 tc 0 32 0 r . . 8 8 8 8 0 16 8 16 16 16 16 1 0 None
> 0x27 24 dc 0 24 0 r y . 8 8 8 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 None> 0x28 24 dc 0 24 0 r y . 8 8 8 0 0 16 8 16 16 16 0 1 0 None> 0x29 24 dc 0 32 0 r y . 8 8 8 8 0 16 8 16 16 16 16 1 0 None
> 0x2a 24 dc 0 32 0 r . . 8 8 8 8 0 16 8 16 16 16 16 1 0 None>>> Did you replace the libGL from fglrx?>>> I uninstalled the ati driver before trying the xorg radeon driver if
> you are referring to this.>> Also I compiled the radeon driver and loaded the module from the kernel> before starting X.>Dear Andras Lorincz,next time, please also post your answer in the newsgroup.
In your log /var/log/Xorg.0.log there is no line saying"Direct rendering enabled"So there should be a line saying "Direct rendering disabled" and someexplaining text around it.What is it saying?
Regards,Jörg-Volker.P.S.: I posted this also in the newsgroup linux.debian.userSome grammar mistake...
That's gmail's fault, when I press reply, it doesn't reply by default to the list and I forgot to change the destination :)
As regarding direct rendering, I say hmm...:(II) RADEON(0): Direct rendering broken on XPRESS 200 and 200M(WW) RADEON(0): Direct rendering disabledIt seems that direct rendering is broken in xorg for x200m chipsets. That explains.
dri with radeon x200
Andras Lorincz wrote:
>
> ...
>
> As regarding direct rendering, I say hmm...:
>
> (II) RADEON(0): Direct rendering broken on XPRESS 200 and 200M
> (WW) RADEON(0): Direct rendering disabled
>
> It seems that direct rendering is broken in xorg for x200m chipsets.
> That explains.
I also have a laptop with this chipset. On the DRI wiki there is a page
about it: http://dri.freedesktop.org/wiki/Radeon200M
At present, if I need 3D acceleration I use the ATI driver.
Regards,
Jörg-Volker.
--
dri with radeon x200
What is the output of
grep -i enabled /var/log/Xorg.0.log
and
LIBGL_DEBUG=verbose glxinfo
?
Did you replace the libGL from fglrx?
Regards,
Jörg-Volker.
--
dri with radeon x200
Andras Lorincz wrote:
> > What is the output of
> > grep -i enabled /var/log/Xorg.0.log
>
>
> This gives me:
>
> (==) AIGLX enabled
> (II) RADEON(0): Color tiling enabled by default
> (II) RADEON(0): Acceleration enabled
> (**) RADEON(0): DPMS enabled
> (==) RADEON(0): Silken mouse enabled
> (==) RandR enabled
> (II) USB Mouse: ps2EnableDataReporting: succeeded
>
> > and
> > LIBGL_DEBUG=verbose glxinfo
> > ?
>
>
> This gives me:
>
> Xlib: extension "XFree86-DRI" missing on display ":0.0".
> libGL error: XF86DRIQueryDirectRenderingCapable failed
> display: :0 screen: 0
> direct rendering: No
> server glx vendor string: SGI
> server glx version string: 1.2
> server glx extensions:
> GLX_ARB_multisample, GLX_EXT_visual_info, GLX_EXT_visual_rating,
> GLX_EXT_import_context, GLX_EXT_texture_from_pixmap, GLX_OML_swap_method,
> GLX_SGI_make_current_read, GLX_SGIS_multisample, GLX_SGIX_hyperpipe,
> GLX_SGIX_swap_barrier, GLX_SGIX_fbconfig, GLX_MESA_copy_sub_buffer
> client glx vendor string: ATI
> client glx version string: 1.3
> client glx extensions:
> GLX_EXT_visual_info, GLX_EXT_visual_rating, GLX_EXT_import_context,
> GLX_ARB_get_proc_address, GLX_SGI_video_sync, GLX_ARB_multisample,
> GLX_ATI_pixel_format_float, GLX_ATI_render_texture
> GLX version: 1.2
> GLX extensions:
> GLX_EXT_visual_info, GLX_EXT_visual_rating, GLX_EXT_import_context,
> GLX_ARB_multisample
> OpenGL vendor string: Mesa project: www.mesa3d.org
> OpenGL renderer string: Mesa GLX Indirect
> OpenGL version string: 1.2 (1.5 Mesa 6.5.1)
> OpenGL extensions:
> GL_ARB_imaging, GL_ARB_multitexture, GL_ARB_texture_border_clamp,
> GL_ARB_texture_cube_map, GL_ARB_texture_env_add,
> GL_ARB_texture_env_combine, GL_ARB_texture_env_dot3,
> GL_ARB_transpose_matrix, GL_EXT_abgr, GL_EXT_blend_color,
> GL_EXT_blend_minmax, GL_EXT_blend_subtract, GL_EXT_texture_env_add,
> GL_EXT_texture_env_combine, GL_EXT_texture_env_dot3,
> GL_EXT_texture_lod_bias
> glu version: 1.3
> glu extensions:
> GLU_EXT_nurbs_tessellator, GLU_EXT_object_space_tess
>
> visual x bf lv rg d st colorbuffer ax dp st accumbuffer ms cav
> id dep cl sp sz l ci b ro r g b a bf th cl r g b a ns b eat
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 0x23 24 tc 0 24 0 r y . 8 8 8 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 None
> 0x24 24 tc 0 24 0 r y . 8 8 8 0 0 16 8 16 16 16 0 1 0 None
> 0x25 24 tc 0 32 0 r y . 8 8 8 8 0 16 8 16 16 16 16 1 0 None
> 0x26 24 tc 0 32 0 r . . 8 8 8 8 0 16 8 16 16 16 16 1 0 None
> 0x27 24 dc 0 24 0 r y . 8 8 8 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 None
> 0x28 24 dc 0 24 0 r y . 8 8 8 0 0 16 8 16 16 16 0 1 0 None
> 0x29 24 dc 0 32 0 r y . 8 8 8 8 0 16 8 16 16 16 16 1 0 None
> 0x2a 24 dc 0 32 0 r . . 8 8 8 8 0 16 8 16 16 16 16 1 0 None
>
>
> > Did you replace the libGL from fglrx?
>
>
> I uninstalled the ati driver before trying the xorg radeon driver if
> you are referring to this.
>
> Also I compiled the radeon driver and loaded the module from the kernel
> before starting X.
Dear Andras Lorincz,
next time, please also post your answer in the newsgroup.
In your log /var/log/Xorg.0.log there is no line saying
"Direct rendering enabled"
So there should be a line saying "Direct rendering disabled" and some
explaining text around it.
What is it saying?
Regards,
Jörg-Volker.
--