NavigationUser loginSpam?See spam posts on this site? If so, please don't reply to the spam! Instead, just report the URL to the webmaster. |
Lightweight RTF Editor in Debian?Hello, I have been looking for a lightweight RTF text editor for Lenny for Thanks, |
Lightweight RTF Editor in Debian?
> Hello,
>
> I have been looking for a lightweight RTF text editor for Lenny for
> quite a while now. Currently, I am using AbiWord, but all the
> dependencies on Gnome libraries are somewhat unpleasant (I'm using
> FluxBox as my WM). I have tried Ted, but I can't even get it to open a
> document. Are there any other lightweight editors that speak RTF?
I have not tried AbiWord. Probably should.
Problem with RTF is that it's Microsoft's language and they will do with it
whatever they please and you'd better learn to like it. Differing versions
and subversions of their software may do RTF entirely differently. The RTF
standard (Microsoft? There is such a document--doesn't mean they follow it
themselves) says that an RTF reader should accept anything thrown at it
gracefully. There are alternates in the language for problematic/optional
commands and objects.
I wrote the RTF filters for Dagesh/Accent which were maybe the most complete
and better such filters around. Then Msoft put in Unicode support (aka
kludge) and the interoperability was broken. Had the privilege afterwards of
fixing this. Interoperability with Word was quite nice and did work with
OpenOffice but alas, OO's current RTF seems to work best with its own
exported RTF. Now crashes with mine. Not very gracefull (I would be joyfully
willing to work on this but Sun is an employer, pretty please....)
Maintaining RTF reader/editors is a pain because one is chasing an
ever-changing target made by a self-styled omnipotent rule-maker/braker.
--
Lightweight RTF Editor in Debian?
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 06:51:56PM +0300, David Baron wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I have been looking for a lightweight RTF text editor for Lenny for
> > quite a while now. Currently, I am using AbiWord, but all the
> > dependencies on Gnome libraries are somewhat unpleasant (I'm using
> > FluxBox as my WM). I have tried Ted, but I can't even get it to open a
> > document. Are there any other lightweight editors that speak RTF?
>
> I have not tried AbiWord. Probably should.
It is a good and decent word processor; the only thing that bugs me is
that it requires massive amounts of libraries that I don't otherwise
need.
> Problem with RTF is that it's Microsoft's language and they will do with it
> whatever they please and you'd better learn to like it.[...]
Yes. AbiWord exports to two different versions of RTF and there is
still a lot that's liable to get lost. But the alternative would be to
use OpenOffice's Word export - and I've had nothing but trouble with
that. My boss likes his MS Office and his 'rich' formatting -
otherwise, I'd gladly hand in all my papers in plain text. *shrugs*
All things considered, AbiWord is the lesser of the available evils. I
just wish it didn't come with all the stuff I really don't need or
want.
Thanks,
-Juergen
Lightweight RTF Editor in Debian?
>> Hello,
>>
>> I have been looking for a lightweight RTF text editor for Lenny for
>> quite a while now. Currently, I am using AbiWord, but all the
>> dependencies on Gnome libraries are somewhat unpleasant (I'm using
>> FluxBox as my WM). I have tried Ted, but I can't even get it to open a
>> document. Are there any other lightweight editors that speak RTF?
>I have not tried AbiWord. Probably should.
Works just fine. Imports RTF exactly as does Kword. So exactly that I believe
they use the same parser. ought in all text with default colors of ... black
on black. Very useful.
Font inconsistancies were to be expected since the doc was made in Win98.
--
Lightweight RTF Editor in Debian?
On Thursday 31 May 2007, wrote:
> > > did you test TED?
> >
> > Just did. Brings in the right overall format but font sizes are not
> > necessarily correct. Main problem is that it not handle the character
> > codepages (for a Windows Hebrew document). Probably decent for good old
> > English.
>
> You got Ted to work? How did you do it? What version of Debian are you
> using? Did it work right out of the box?
Installed it off Sid. Worked right out of the box.
--
Lightweight RTF Editor in Debian?
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 09:01:04PM +0300, David Baron wrote:
> On Thursday 31 May 2007, wrote:
> > > > did you test TED?
> > >
> > > Just did. Brings in the right overall format but font sizes are not
> > > necessarily correct. Main problem is that it not handle the character
> > > codepages (for a Windows Hebrew document). Probably decent for good old
> > > English.
> >
> > You got Ted to work? How did you do it? What version of Debian are you
> > using? Did it work right out of the box?
>
> Installed it off Sid. Worked right out of the box.
Dang... Tried it on my sid machine ad it worked without a hitch. Maybe
I'll have to see whether I can install the sid packages on my lenny
machine or something.
Thanks,
-Juergen
Lightweight RTF Editor in Debian?
On Wednesday 30 May 2007, wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I have been looking for a lightweight RTF text editor for Lenny for
> > quite a while now. Currently, I am using AbiWord, but all the
> > dependencies on Gnome libraries are somewhat unpleasant (I'm using
> > FluxBox as my WM). I have tried Ted, but I can't even get it to open a
> > document. Are there any other lightweight editors that speak RTF?
>
> did you test TED?
Just did. Brings in the right overall format but font sizes are not
necessarily correct. Main problem is that it not handle the character
codepages (for a Windows Hebrew document). Probably decent for good old
English.
--
Lightweight RTF Editor in Debian?
On Wednesday 30 May 2007, wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I have been looking for a lightweight RTF text editor for Lenny for
> > quite a while now. Currently, I am using AbiWord, but all the
> > dependencies on Gnome libraries are somewhat unpleasant (I'm using
> > FluxBox as my WM). I have tried Ted, but I can't even get it to open a
> > document. Are there any other lightweight editors that speak RTF?
>
> did you test TED?
Just did. Brings in the right overall format but font sizes are not
necessarily correct. Main problem is that it not handle the character
codepages (for a Windows Hebrew document). Probably decent for good old
English.
--
Lightweight RTF Editor in Debian?
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 09:55:53PM +0300, David Baron wrote:
[...]
> > did you test TED?
>
> Just did. Brings in the right overall format but font sizes are not
> necessarily correct. Main problem is that it not handle the character
> codepages (for a Windows Hebrew document). Probably decent for good old
> English.
You got Ted to work? How did you do it? What version of Debian are you
using? Did it work right out of the box?
Thanks,
~Juergen
Lightweight RTF Editor in Debian?
On 5/30/07, Juergen Fiedler wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have been looking for a lightweight RTF text editor for Lenny for
> quite a while now. Currently, I am using AbiWord, but all the
> dependencies on Gnome libraries are somewhat unpleasant (I'm using
> FluxBox as my WM). I have tried Ted, but I can't even get it to open a
> document. Are there any other lightweight editors that speak RTF?
did you test TED?
--
Atentamente, yo
Y sin fumar desde (casi) el '1089515700'
http://www.nnss.d7.be
Let one walk alone, commit no sin,
with few wishes, like an elephant in the forest
Trouble running Ted (Was: Lightweight RTF Editor in Debian?)
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 02:07:16PM -0300, Mat?as Palomec wrote:
> On 5/30/07, Juergen Fiedler wrote:
> >Hello,
> >
> >I have been looking for a lightweight RTF text editor for Lenny for
> >quite a while now. Currently, I am using AbiWord, but all the
> >dependencies on Gnome libraries are somewhat unpleasant (I'm using
> >FluxBox as my WM). I have tried Ted, but I can't even get it to open a
> >document. Are there any other lightweight editors that speak RTF?
>
> did you test TED?
Yep. Just doesn't work for me: If I try (for example) 'ted
Network.rtf', I get much output on my console, looking roughly like
this:
-----
docRtfUtil.c(1302) rrc->rrcCurrentLine=3 controlWord="fttruetype"
docRtfUtil.c(1302) rrc->rrcCurrentLine=4 controlWord="fttruetype"
[...]
docRtfUtil.c(1302) rrc->rrcCurrentLine=95
controlWord="abinodiroverride"
appFont.c(812) aff->affFontFamilyName="Times"
afe->afeXfontFamilies=0x0
appFont.c(813) encoding=8
PS_Encodings[encoding].fcX11Registry="iso8859"
appFont.c(814) encoding=8 PS_Encodings[encoding].fcX11Encoding="15"
appFont.c(1111) psf->affFontFamilyName="Times" dsf->apfFontEncoding=8
appFont.c(1167) 1=1
tedLayout.c(995) attributeNumber=0
sfl->sflAttributeToScreen[attributeNumber]=-1
tedLayout.c(1022) part=0 textAttr=0
tedLayout.c(852) 1=1
docLayoutParagraphs.c( 82) 1=1
docLayoutParagraphs.c(142) 1=1
docLayoutParagraphs.c(494) 1=1
docLayout.c(825) 1=1
docLayout.c(805) 1=1
docLayoutSect.c(148) i=0
docLayout.c(836) 1=1
docLayout.c(732) 1=1
docLayout.c(797) 1=1
docLayout.c(932) 1=1
tedLayout.c(1071) 1=1
tedPage.c(332) 1=1
tedDocument.c(571) 1=1
appDocument.c(579) ed->edFilename="/root/Network.rtf"
appDocument.c(752) filename="/root/Network.rtf"
-----
I see the main window with the menu bar, but the document itself never
opens. Getting that to work would definitely be a splendid thing.
Would you happen to be able to tell from the output I pasted what I
might be doing wrong?
Thanks,
-Juergen
Lightweight RTF Editor in Debian?
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 09:45:08AM -0400, Juergen Fiedler wrote:
>
> I have been looking for a lightweight RTF text editor for Lenny for
> quite a while now. Currently, I am using AbiWord, but all the
> dependencies on Gnome libraries are somewhat unpleasant (I'm using
> FluxBox as my WM). I have tried Ted, but I can't even get it to open a
> document. Are there any other lightweight editors that speak RTF?
>
What about latex2rtf for outputing rtf and wv, catdoc, or unrtf to get latex?
I suppose the question is, in what way do you create non-rtf documents
and can that method also work with rtf?
Searching aptitude, re Ted it says that "going the other way" i.e.
opening existing documents is more difficult.
Doug.
--
Lightweight RTF Editor in Debian?
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 08:17:33PM -0400, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
> On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 09:45:08AM -0400, Juergen Fiedler wrote:
> >
> > I have been looking for a lightweight RTF text editor for Lenny for
> > quite a while now. Currently, I am using AbiWord, but all the
> > dependencies on Gnome libraries are somewhat unpleasant (I'm using
> > FluxBox as my WM). I have tried Ted, but I can't even get it to open a
> > document. Are there any other lightweight editors that speak RTF?
> >
>
> What about latex2rtf for outputing rtf and wv, catdoc, or unrtf to get latex?
I'd considered that, but I think having to install Latex to create
documents when all my boss wants is page breaks, centered text and
different font sizes runs counter to my intention to keep it as small
as possible.
> I suppose the question is, in what way do you create non-rtf documents
> and can that method also work with rtf?
There's a thought. I create my 'regular' text files in vim, and it
looks like RTF is a text based markup language. Maybe I could just
learn to write it directly.
> Searching aptitude, re Ted it says that "going the other way" i.e.
> opening existing documents is more difficult.
I'm not surprised. But I can't even start a new document in Ted. Still
no idea what I am doing wrong.
Thanks,
-Juergen
Lightweight RTF Editor in Debian?
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 09:59:53AM -0400, Juergen Fiedler wrote:
> On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 08:17:33PM -0400, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
>
>> What about latex2rtf for outputing rtf and wv, catdoc, or unrtf to
>> get latex?
>
> I'd considered that, but I think having to install Latex to create
> documents when all my boss wants is page breaks, centered text and
> different font sizes runs counter to my intention to keep it as small
> as possible.
>
> > I suppose the question is, in what way do you create non-rtf
> > documents and can that method also work with rtf?
>
> There's a thought. I create my 'regular' text files in vim, and it
> looks like RTF is a text based markup language. Maybe I could just
> learn to write it directly.
>
Do you do other formats for other than your boss?
Does you boss want RTF of is it just "page breaks, centered text, and
different fonts"? What file formats will your boss accept? Will he
accept pdf or ps? Would enscript do? It will output in RTF if you
like.
Doug.
--
Lightweight RTF Editor in Debian?
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 11:42:17AM -0400, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
> Do you do other formats for other than your boss?
I don't really generate any documents except for him.
> Does you boss want RTF of is it just "page breaks, centered text, and
> different fonts"? What file formats will your boss accept? Will he
> accept pdf or ps? Would enscript do? It will output in RTF if you
> like.
He wants something that he can edit in MS Word if necessary, that can
be read and printed in OS X and that lets you organize the text with
page breaks and large headers. If it wasn't for the page breaks (and
those are mostly to maintain a separate cover sheet), even HTML would
probably do. I had, at one point, thoughts of doing stuff in HTML and
just keeping the cover page in a separate file, but I don't think that
that would fly...
Thanks,
~Juergen
--
Lightweight RTF Editor in Debian?
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 01:51:59PM -0400, Juergen Fiedler wrote:
> On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 11:42:17AM -0400, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
> > Does you boss want RTF of is it just "page breaks, centered text, and
> > different fonts"? What file formats will your boss accept? Will he
> > accept pdf or ps? Would enscript do? It will output in RTF if you
> > like.
>
> He wants something that he can edit in MS Word if necessary, that can
> be read and printed in OS X and that lets you organize the text with
> page breaks and large headers. If it wasn't for the page breaks (and
> those are mostly to maintain a separate cover sheet), even HTML would
> probably do. I had, at one point, thoughts of doing stuff in HTML and
> just keeping the cover page in a separate file, but I don't think that
> that would fly...
>
Presumably, he not only wants to edit (which he could latex) but to then
regeneratet it (which he can't unless he has latex for MS and OSX).
Since I've never used MS Word or OSX, I don't know what your choices
are.
By stipulating that he wants both typeset output and the ability to edit
and regenerate it, this becomes a problem of distributed text
processing. In acedemia the standard has been LaTex until MS invaded.
I think that in debian you're limited to lout, latex, OO,
Koffice, Lyx, and a few other markup language processors. You'll have
to see what is available for the other OSs and what he's willing to put
on his computer. What is the editor in OSX that he uses and what
formats can it work with?
If he _doesn't_ need to regenerate the file, just change a few words,
then give him latex source and pdf output and he can edit it directly
and give it back to you to regenerate.
Doug.
--
Lightweight RTF Editor in Debian?
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 08:37:45PM -0400, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
> On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 01:51:59PM -0400, Juergen Fiedler wrote:
> > On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 11:42:17AM -0400, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
>
> > > Does you boss want RTF of is it just "page breaks, centered text, and
> > > different fonts"? What file formats will your boss accept? Will he
> > > accept pdf or ps? Would enscript do? It will output in RTF if you
> > > like.
> >
> > He wants something that he can edit in MS Word if necessary, that can
> > be read and printed in OS X and that lets you organize the text with
> > page breaks and large headers. If it wasn't for the page breaks (and
> > those are mostly to maintain a separate cover sheet), even HTML would
> > probably do. I had, at one point, thoughts of doing stuff in HTML and
> > just keeping the cover page in a separate file, but I don't think that
> > that would fly...
> >
>
> Presumably, he not only wants to edit (which he could latex) but to then
> regeneratet it (which he can't unless he has latex for MS and OSX).
> Since I've never used MS Word or OSX, I don't know what your choices
> are.
RTF is pretty much it, really. If it wasn't for the critical
importance of page breaks, HTML might be fine, but as it is, RTF is
the 'standard' that's used in my office and that's what I have to
deliver.
> By stipulating that he wants both typeset output and the ability to edit
> and regenerate it, this becomes a problem of distributed text
> processing. In acedemia the standard has been LaTex until MS invaded.
>
> I think that in debian you're limited to lout, latex, OO,
> Koffice, Lyx, and a few other markup language processors. You'll have
> to see what is available for the other OSs and what he's willing to put
> on his computer. What is the editor in OSX that he uses and what
> formats can it work with?
>
> If he _doesn't_ need to regenerate the file, just change a few words,
> then give him latex source and pdf output and he can edit it directly
> and give it back to you to regenerate.
I considered going the Latex rute - I'd just create my RTF files from
the Latex source - but I think that that would take up even more space
than AbiWord. It's a tough call; I would still prefer plain text or
maybe troff, but that's not my decision to make.
Well, we'll see what comes from it; I still hope that I can make Ted
work on my Lenny box.
Thanks,
-Juergen