NavigationUser loginSpam?See spam posts on this site? If so, please don't reply to the spam! Instead, just report the URL to the webmaster. |
Nuclear safety. Is it an oxymoron?This is typical of third world countries and nuclear cover-ups. Can someone pass me a Hershey bar? Yes,the one that's glowing in the dark. Radioactive leak at Japanese plant was undetected for days By ERIC TALMADGE KASHIWAZAKI, Japan — Radioactive material leaked undetected for days at an earthquake-battered nuclear power plant even as the utility was assuring the public that the damage posed no danger to those outside the site, company executives admitted today. The revelation cast more doubt on the plant's emergency measures and the response by Japan's largest power company, while the indefinite shutdown of the world's most powerful electricity generating facility raised serious fears of a summer power shortage. Tokyo Electric Power Co. confirmed reports that radioactive material was leaking as late as Wednesday night, nearly three days after the plant suffered a near-direct hit from a quake that killed 10 people and injured more than 1,000 in Kashiwazaki on Japan's northern coast. It was government inspectors who found radioactive iodine venting from an exhaust pipe at the plant's No. 7 nuclear reactor, said Hisanori Nei, an official with the Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency. It escaped between Tuesday and Wednesday night, Nei said. Tokyo Electric previously announced other radioactive materials had escaped from the pipe, but not iodine. An exhaust fan inside the building may not have been turned off as instructed in the operations manual, company spokesman Manabu Takeyama said. Government inspectors concluded the iodine leak was too small to harm the environment or public health, Nei said. The utility also stressed the amount was extremely low and said it posed no threat to the environment or local people. But the revelation reinforced concerns about the plant's safety, coming a day after Tokyo Electric issued a list of previously unreported damage from the quake — including a fire, burst pipes and waste spillage. The seven reactors at the Kashiwazaki-Kariwa plant shut down automatically when the quake hit, and authorities have ordered the plant closed indefinitely while inspections and repairs are carried out to assure it can be restarted safely. Tokyo Electric has warned that the closure could cause a power shortage in Japan as demand rises from summer use of air conditioners. Six other power companies have said they will cooperate in providing emergency electricity and Tokyo Electric is considering restarting generating plants fueled by oil and natural gas, the utility said late today. Chief Cabinet Secretary Yasuhisa Shiozaki urged the operators of Japan's 55 nuclear reactors — suppliers of one-third of Japan's energy — to speed up safety checks for earthquake resistance, a top concern in the temblor-prone nation. "Since there was such a huge earthquake that surpassed our expectations, we need to consider future measures for quake resistance," Shiozaki said. "I asked them to speed up the assessment and checkups wherever possible." Officials at the plant conceded earlier that they had not foreseen the possibility of an earthquake as powerful as the magnitude-6.8 temblor that hit Monday. They also said the utility hadn't known about the nearby offshore fault line in which the quake occurred. The utility announced today that the force of the quake exceeded its resistance guidelines at all seven reactors, sometimes by more than double. Public broadcaster NHK said the reading at the No. 1 reactor was the strongest quake ever measured at a Japanese reactor. Tokyo Electric has repeatedly underreported the quake's impact. After initially saying it had caused a fire in an electrical transformer and the spill of radioactive water into the Sea of Japan, the company reported 50 incidents of damage or leaks. Then it upped the number to 63. Its stock tumbled again today, sliding 5.6 percent to 3,400 yen a share, or $27.88, bringing its losses since the quake to 10.3 percent. Members of the Nuclear Safety Commission toured the sprawling plant today and criticized Tokyo Electric for missteps in its response to the earthquake. Even so, they concluded none of the errors had threatened public health. The safety of the "plant was fundamentally maintained and we avoided the serious consequences of a nuclear accident," commission Chairman Atsuyuki Suzuki said in a statement. "The list of problems announced by TEPCO have no serious effect on the safety of the reactor." Tokyo Electric has been punished for failing to accurately inform the public of problems in the past. Four years ago, the utility was forced to halt all of its 17 nuclear reactors after admitting it misreported safety problems in the late 1980s and early 1990s. The halt caused a power shortage in the summer of 2003, and other utilities stepped in with emergency electricity production. In that scandal, a trade ministry report revealed 29 cases of cracks or minor structural damage in eight of Tokyo Electric's reactors, including two reactors at Kashiwazaki-Kariwa. The company's top three executives resigned, but the utility insisted the cracks never posed a serious danger. The last of the shuttered reactors wasn't cleared to reopen until July 2005. The impact of Monday's quake has spread far beyond the region. Japan's auto companies had to suspend production because a key parts maker sustained damage during the temblor. Officials at the damaged factory said they expected to restart production early next week. People in the Kashiwazaki region struggled to put their lives back together but basic services such as water had not been restored to some areas. "We're just getting by day by day," said Masatoshi Ogawa, sitting in front of his closed pinball parlor. "Our houses were OK so we didn't have to go to evacuation centers, but life without water is really inconvenient." |
nuke cover-ups
If you want a nuclear cover-up think "Three-Mile Island". That's the Chernobyl of the USA. The Japanese reactors didn't have problems because of poor quality or Homer Simpson running the plant, they were hit by the sort of earthquake that caused all those gas leaks/fires and collapsed bridges in California over a decade ago. It's pretty amazing that the plants can shut down so quickly and on their own - far more advanced than most US reactors. An Iodine leak too small to pose a risk to the public really is a small leak and they've done very well to find it. Radioactive iodine is what's used for thyroid scans in the medical industry - it won't persist in the environment for long. The thing about the Japanese is that if things were really bad, you'd see people apologizing in public and then going off to hang themselves - they're a strange bunch. Very different from US managers - I remember when over 15,000 Indians were killed by Union Carbide the managers simply fled the country and denied anything was wrong.
nuke cover-ups
I only eat three mile island hershey bars. You can find them in the dark.
If memory serves, there are reactors sitting on fault lines in the U.S. Money must be made ahead of safety.
The japanese are the most careful of people when dealing with radioactivity. They have living proof of its effects on the human body.
nuke cover-ups
It's over 20 years since a (civilian power) nuke reactor has been built in the USA - since most nukes had an initial projected life of 30 years that means that by the original designs most reactors should be shut down and some only have 10 years left. Then again the space shuttle fleet (with the exception of the Endeavor) should have been scrapped a decade ago. Like the shuttles, the nukes will probably be run until they fall apart - the core shielding will probably suffer catastrophic failure due to radiation damage. After all they're all privately run, which means squeeze all the money you can out of them and abandon it when it becomes a problem.
Looking at records of accidents, maybe we should be paying the French to build and operate nuclear civilian power generators - the French are either exceptionally good at building and operating these plants or they're better than the Soviet Union at covering up incidents. They also have something unbelievable like over 80% of electricity generated by nukes - the UK is probably the runner-up with about 30%. Australia recently got a light-water research reactor from Argentina (yes, Australia supplies the world with uranium but hasn't got the ability to even build a reactor) which seems to have been commissioned without any public announcement.
Nuclear safety. Is it an
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070820/ap_on_re_us/nuclear_secrets;_ylt=AlvslVZmWxe9jCgvS3NsGL1H2ocA
'nuff said. In other news, Australia has shut down its light-water research reactor which had barely got up and running. The contract to build it went to the cheapest bidder of course - in this case Argentina. The French reactors are far from the cheapest - but they work well (and they're not operated by Homer Simpson). After about 40 years of operation I still don't know of any glow-in-the-dark frogs. Except perhaps for naval reactors, US civilian power reactors are about par with Soviet reactors for safety. We're decades behind the French and probably years behind the Canadians too.
Nuclear safety. Is it an
remind me how would radiation damage compromise the shielding of the core?
Nuclear safety. Is it an
The core shielding is bombarded with a very high neutron flux and its mechanical properties (and even chemical properties) will change. Who knows how long these things will hold out (presumably the people who designed them may have a clue). Knowing how overpaid managers don't care about quality or safety, only whatever money they can extract, I have no confidence in the safe operation of US reactors. As a good example of how nice energy corporations are (a non-nuke situation) just look at what Enron did to California - took generators offline to drive up prices. Well, Enron is gone but those sort of bastard managers are all too common. I wouldn't want to be living anywhere near a reactor, especially since there's an established history of coverups of incidents.
cause for the failure of ... cooling towers has not been
Wednesday, August 22
BRATTLEBORO -- Structural problems in one of the banks of cooling fans at Vermont Yankee nuclear power plant forced operators to dial back on the facility's power output.
Though the cause for the failure of one of the plant's 22 cooling towers has not yet been determined, said a spokesman for the power plant, he assured the public that shutting down 11 of the fans doesn't affect safety.
http://www.reformer.com/headlines/ci_6685658
I happen to live about 45 miles NW of this one and don't like it at all. The screw ups in this facility are manifold and many if not most folks in the state want it shut down. But the Republican Gov does not..
cause for the failure of ... cooling towers has not been
I like that one - it reminds me of China. "Our cooling system is failing, but it's not really a problem." The nukes usually have a "closed loop" for the part heated by the reactor, then a second "closed loop" using heat from the first one to convert water to steam and drive the turbines, then an "open system" for converting that steam back into liquid water so it can be pumped back, heated to steam and so on. In the "open" part, water is taken from a river/lake/sea, sprayed onto a radiator to cool the "closed" power generator part, and then that water is cooled again before dumping it back in the river/etc. A lot of the water is actually converted to steam in the process, which is why the cooling towers usually have a huge plume pouring out of them. I guess it's that final cooling stage that's failing and the plant operators don't care if they just dump hot water into the river, cook all the fish, and encourage algal growth downstream.